On Tuesday 10 August 2010 13:14:37 Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 13:42 +0200, Henning Eggers wrote: > > Am 09.08.2010 22:08, schrieb Jelmer Vernooij: > > > On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 02:48 +0700, Jeroen Vermeulen wrote: > > >> On 2010-08-05 15:29, Martin Pool wrote: > > >>> I don't think it's an awful name, but 'general', 'shared', etc may be > > >>> better. > > >> > > >> Both of those sound like they mean... well, Foundations basically. > > >> > > >> I like "inter." To throw a few more terms into the mix: "multi," > > >> "combo." > > > > > > I like inter, too. multi, general, shared, etc. all suggest to me like > > > they are about code that happens to be used by more than one lp > > > subsystem. > > > > I am all for "shared", though, because that's what it is about. The code > > *will* be used by more than on lp subsystem, will it not? > > > > "shared" FTW! ;-) > > That is true for more parts of the code that, as I understand it, won't > live under lp.shared/lp.inter. E.g. buildmaster, testing, scripts, > services, etc.
On a related note, I am wary of slapping every "shared" module under services. I guess I don't like typing long imports. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
