On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Robert Collins <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:05 PM, William Grant <[email protected]> > wrote: >>> This would chop 4 hours off the time that things take to deploy, >>> remove one buildbot queue and generally make the whole code->live >>> story a bit simpler, at the cost of making the security-fix story more >>> complex. Personally, I think that that is a net win. >> >> It's not just security fixes that need this sort of treatment. See, for >> example, jtv's recent emergency Codehosting fix: it needed to skip ahead >> of un-QA'd revisions. Cowboying may be appropriate here too. I don't >> really know. > > So really, we're saying that there are two sorts of changes: > - must-deploy-asap > - deploy-with-due-care >
This sounds straightforward. Would it be appropriate to start tracking how often we engage the "must-deploy-asap" branch of the process? jml _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
