I agree with Robert, we should not have more than 2 hours of down time. Let's revert the patch if that is the case.
-- Francis J. Lacoste [email protected] On October 6, 2010, Robert Collins wrote: > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Stuart Bishop > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Edwin Grubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Stuart, > >> > >> Do you have the staging db restore time that we use to announce the > >> estimated downtime for the Launchpad release? > > > > This is a tricky one to estimate. There is a large change in the > > pipeline that on staging took 3 hours last time it ran. However, this > > patch should run much faster on the production hardware (the slowness > > is rebuilding indexes on the 600 million rows of the BranchRevision > > table). > > > > So based on this, I would guess up to 5 hours. > > > > However, we have also upgraded to PG 8.4. We should get a better > > timing this weekend under PG 8.4. > > 5 hours downtime is -huge- right after Ubuntu releases. > > Lets roll that patch back and discuss alternate approaches, if the > indication on Monday is that we're looking at more than an hours total > downtime. > > -Rob > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
