On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Robert Collins <robert.coll...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Deryck Hodge <deryck.ho...@canonical.com> > wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Robert Collins >> <robert.coll...@canonical.com> wrote: >>> So I've marked rRevision 11794 as bad, but I haven't rolled it back [yet]. >>> >>> We're not getting bug mail from launchpad on qastaging or staging, >>> which is rather concerning; we've verified that sending mail on asuka >>> gets to the staging mailbox. >> >> I think everything is working fine. I poked at a bug on staging >> (changed status, privacy, and commented) and then asked Tom to run >> ./cronscripts/send-bug-notifications.py on staging, and then checked >> the staging IMAP mail box. I saw the mail I expected. So I've marked >> the bug as qa-ok and removed the bad commit tag. >> >> Was this a case of not running >> ./cronscripts/send-bug-notifications.py? It has to be run manually. >> >> Or perhaps this was something else that is now fixed and no one replied here? > > Not sure. We also need to check that structural subscribers were > notified as well. >
Yes, structural subscribers were notified as well. I checked the mail for various rationale's (direct subscriber, direct subscribing team, structural) and also against the subscribers lists on the bug. Cheers, deryck -- Deryck Hodge https://launchpad.net/~deryck http://www.devurandom.org/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
