Hi, Tim. Thanks for weighing in.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Tim Penhey <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:18:32 Gary Poster wrote: > The page tests often test workflows, which are getting more out of date with > the addition of more ajax stuff, but I think it still has some, but limited, > use. But this is my whole point exactly.... your own words: you *think* they have *some* use. We don't know the value of these tests or how much usefulness they provide. We don't know the amount of coverage we actually get from them. We have half or better of a four+ hour test run for these tests and we have no way to assess the value of this cost. We have developers avoiding page tests and windmill at all costs and no clear story of even why we use them or what we expect from them. It seems to me a short and controlled experiment is an easy way to get some data on these questions. Cheers, deryck -- Deryck Hodge https://launchpad.net/~deryck http://www.devurandom.org/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
