On 9 November 2010 11:13, Julian Edwards <julian.edwa...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Monday 01 November 2010 06:34:02 Tim Penhey wrote: >> No changes to the branch and we get this. >> >> We need to SERIOUSLY do something about the windmill tests. They have >> caused *constant* delays to getting things landed. >> >> I'd bet that every single one of these failures is intermittant and works >> fine locally. > > I think we should revert back to a separate buildbot run for Windmill tests. > Do we really need to run them for every single landed branch?
+1. I don't think that Windmill tests are helping out for anything other than changes which affect user interaction. As has been discussed in another thread, maybe we should consider them a barrier to deployment rather than landing. -- Graham Binns | PGP Key: EC66FA7D http://launchpad.net/~gmb _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
