On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Francis J. Lacoste <[email protected]> wrote: > On November 16, 2010, Martin Pool wrote: >> On 16 November 2010 09:59, Francis J. Lacoste ... >> > - Discussion on the priority of those bugs ensue. >> >> I think that's a great idea, to make sure that there are not too many >> bugs open before we move on. I wonder if we should advertise that >> more broadly than just the individual stakeholders - perhaps a post to >> launchpad-users or the Launchpad blog to say "we think we're done with >> X". This might draw in more people to test it and give us more data. >> (I know it might also lead to attempted bikeshedding, but we can >> handle that.) > > I don't think we need to make this part integral to the policy at this stage. > We do advertise new features at this stage on the blog and mailing lists and > do get bug reports at this time. The process do specify that user submitted > bugs are to be considered in the process. >
Agreed. Also, I think that after we get a little bit more experience with managing new features using feature flags, we should invest some effort into how to do beta programmes well. jml _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
