On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Aaron Bentley <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 12/01/2010 02:55 PM, Francis J. Lacoste wrote: >> Hi Aaron, >> >> Like you probably know, Henninge and Jereon decided to revert the upstream- >> translations-sharing work as proper QA couldn't be completed in the window. >> >> That means that we will need either to merge 10007 (the work was merged into >> 10008) or make sure that everything until at least 10026 is QA-ok (where it >> was reverted). > > 10026 has landed, and I believe all necessary QA has been done, up to > the current tip, 10029. One of the stable revisions merged by 10026 > still need QA: 12008. One of the revisions merged by 10029 still needs > QA: 12011. > > So depending on how QA goes, and what our appetite for risk is, we could > merge 10029. > > There is a fly in the ointment, though. I believe we may exceed our > database time budget. I put us at 3256.47 seconds, which would > translate as ~114 minutes when we deploy. My calculations are attached.
Where did the 1876.47 come from? -- Stuart Bishop <[email protected]> http://www.stuartbishop.net/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
