On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:38:53 +1300, Robert Collins <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Max Kanat-Alexander > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Â - To enable this, we're going to put the work on trunk which isn't > >> yet deployable in Launchpad into a new 'future' branch, and reset > >> trunk back to 1.18 > > > > Â Â Â Â I think the fact that jam has done nearly all the work required > > to > > stabilize trunk in a single day proves that this is unnecessary. > > > > Â Â Â Â It seems likely that creating that "future" branch means it will > > never > > be looked at, and instead of adopting the sweeping architectural changes > > which fix most of loggerhead's problems, you will waste time re-fixing > > all of that piecemeal with a poorer architecture. > > > > Â Â Â Â I do understand the value of your plan, though. Perhaps the best > > solution would be to give jam some time to see what he can do, and then > > make the decision after that. > > John has some time from Martin to do just that; if/when he is > successful, his work can be merged into the consolidated trunk, > released & deployed - nothing is meant to prevent that; merely not to > make doing that a high stress zomg urgency thing required to unblock > bugfixes and maintenance.
If there's anything specific I can do to help with getting the history-db stuff deployed, please ask. I'm pretty convinced it's an improvement in every way we actually care about. Cheers, mwh _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
