I wasn't getting these last week, but suddenly I am getting bounces
again when I comment on loggerhead merge proposals. So it seems the
problem has cropped up again.  (Or, maybe I just didn't comment
specifically on loggerhead since John's mail, and it's just still
active.)

At some level this might be connected to the different outgoing mail
header settings between bugs and reviews.

Martin


Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com)
        by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
        (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
        id 1PvM6g-0007nb-RJ
        for [email protected]; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 03:55:10 +0000
Subject: Re: [Merge] lp:~jameinel/loggerhead/less_work_for_head_716217
 into   lp:loggerhead
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7864264032856119061=="
Message-ID: <mailman.14117.1299210910.26923.launchpad-b...@lists.canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 03:55:10 +0000
Precedence: bulk
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
List-Id: Launchpad Bug Reports <launchpad-bugs.lists.canonical.com>
X-List-Administrivia: yes
Sender: [email protected]
Errors-To: [email protected]

--===============7864264032856119061==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Your message was rejected


--===============7864264032856119061==
Content-Type: message/rfc822
MIME-Version: 1.0

Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139])
        by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
        (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
        id 1PvM6f-0007nR-40
        for [email protected]; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 03:55:09 +0000
Received: from loganberry.canonical.com ([91.189.90.37])
        by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 #1 (Debian))
        id 1PvM6f-000434-0i
        for <[email protected]>; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 03:55:09 +0000
Received: from loganberry.canonical.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by loganberry.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011B82E8103
        for <[email protected]>; Fri,  4 Mar 2011 03:55:09 +0000 
(UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Launchpad-Message-Rationale: Reviewer @loggerhead-team
X-Launchpad-Notification-Type: code-review
X-Launchpad-Branch: ~jameinel/loggerhead/less_work_for_head_716217
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
X-Launchpad-Project: loggerhead
To: John A Meinel <[email protected]>
From: Martin Pool <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Merge] lp:~jameinel/loggerhead/less_work_for_head_716217 into
        lp:loggerhead
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 03:55:08 -0000
Sender: [email protected]
Errors-To: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
X-Generated-By: Launchpad (canonical.com); Revision="12515";
        Instance="initZopeless config overlay"
X-Launchpad-Hash: ac9d4c31267971f54c964b372f7f59ed2b62e5b7

On 3 March 2011 23:04, John A Meinel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Should we kick this back? I'd like to leave it, pending evaluation of whe=
ther the HEAD requests are significant overhead. history-db also reduces th=
e base overhead.

If by kick it/leave it you mean just do nothing with it until we see
that cutting the cost of HEAD requests are really worthwhile, that's
ok with me.  We can just mark it rejected and leave it attached to the
bug.

Sorry for sending you on a wild goose chase; I didn't think enough
about the fact that getting a realistic result might mean taking it
most of the way through rendering.  I don't think cutting the cost of
initial GET is a good tradeoff to speed up later HEAD requests.

I do think it's worthwhile/important that HEAD not actually send a
body back, because that clearly is violating the rfc in a fairly
fundamental way.  Just generating and discarding it is ok with me.

It seems like eventually to be able to stream the body we would need
to be able to tell before rendering whether the request is ultimately
likely to succeed or not.

-- =

https://code.launchpad.net/~jameinel/loggerhead/less_work_for_head_716217/+=
merge/49182
Your team Loggerhead-team is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~=
jameinel/loggerhead/less_work_for_head_716217 into lp:loggerhead.


--===============7864264032856119061==--

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to