* Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> [2011-06-04 09:05 +1200]: > I think progress enhancement is a good solution for content sites > (static content, little interaction). Launchpad is not one of those > sites. We care about accessibility, but we don't particularly care > about access from mobile devices or non-javascript browsers. Imagine > using gmail with a non-js browser.
I just looked at gmail without JavaScript and it's actually quite usable. However, it implements a modal interface where the "standard view" supports JavaScript and the "basic HTML view" doesn't. This is not quite the intent of progressive enhancement which probably doubles the user interface development overhead. I like the distinction you make about content sites, this gives me some reassurance when relying on JavaScript in some cases. Thanks for the insight! -- Marc Tardif <marc.tar...@canonical.com> Freenode: cr3, Jabber: c...@jabber.org 1024D/72679CAD 09A9 D871 F7C4 A18F AC08 674D 2B73 740C 7267 9CAD _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
