On 7 June 2011 07:40, William Grant <william.gr...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 07/06/11 15:21, William Grant wrote: >> [snip undue optimism] >> r13162 is currently being deployed to nodowntime, so we will just be >> deploying the merge revision and the two RC fixes during downtime. >> Assuming nothing goes wrong, the advanced bug subscriptions work will be >> turned on for everyone a couple of hours after we come back up. > > And so the saga continues. Turns out r13154 was bad for the third time > (see comments #7 and #8 in > https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/772609). It has been reverted > in r13168. So we have to deploy at least that.
At this stage I don't think we should attempt to land a working version of that patch - it's obvious that there are some holes in our test coverage - either big or subtle - and I don't particularly want to have to do this whole dance again on a tight timeframe. The fix for 772609 can be rolled out without downtime later. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
