On 15 June 2011 14:25, Jonathan Lange <j...@canonical.com> wrote: > It's also a mind-set thing: "how can I help land this patch?" rather > than looking only for what needs to be fixed. > > I think a change like that would be good.
I agree. We started the move away from "what's wrong with this branch?" at the January Thunderdome and this seems like a good next step (I think it's been mooted before, come to that). > I also think one blocker is that folk are less comfortable landing to, > say, lazr.restful than they are to launchpad. I certainly am. This is a fair point - I'm largely in the same boat as far as lazr.restful is concerned. To mitigate this, we should probably have a list of experts for each sub-project. It's then the patch pilot's job to find an expert who has the time to take a given domain-specific branch (this could also work for individual parts of the LP tree, too: I wouldn't dare tackle piloting Soyuz branch without input from bigjools or wgrant, for example). -- Graham Binns | PGP Key: EC66FA7D http://launchpad.net/~gmb _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
