On Thursday 16 June 2011 10:35:04 Bryce Harrington wrote: > Sorry, yeah I've been aware of the effort but the elevator pitch seemed > geared towards OEMs so I never really took a good look at it until > lifeless showed it. > > I'm mindful of Jono's point about feedback at the tail end of a LEP can > do more harm than good...
Heh. We've actually had good feedback all the way through the development cycle from various OEM, Linaro and Ubuntu guys. > Fair enough. I'm sharing them more for you to suck useful ideas out of > more than anything else. I suspect both GNOME and X guys are pretty set > on our own reports. But the functionality in them might be of some more > general interest. Absolutely, thanks for pointing them out. > Not quite that elaborate, it just indicates difference vs. debian and > difference vs. upstream. So, green if everything's in sync with both > upstream and debian, red if it's not tracking either upstream or debian, > and an intermediate color if it's something in between. So, if you > ignore upstream, a simplified version of this might go something like: > > * Given a version scheme A.B.C-X[ubuntuY] and two versions of a package > > 1. Color green if derived distro's package has same or greater A, B, > C, X numbers. > 2. Color yellow if derived distro has a lower X value > 3. Color red if derived distro has lower A, A.B, or A.B.C values As per my previous email, do the filtering options and other pages get anywhere close to useful? _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
