Hi Jeroen, I am looking at pushing some revisions through deployment, but I don't feel comfortable QAing your fix for bug 394645. I'd appreciate it if you could help get that going (there are 3 revisions that seem related) so we could move on with no-downtime deployments.
FWIW, if you take a look at deployment report for stable[1], you'll notice that it's my revisions r13243, r13248 blocking the deployment, but they are basically qa-ok, but not ready for rolling out until r13258 is ready for landing and included in the "deployment set". In between, we've got 3 of your non-trivial revisions that I couldn't find anyone who'd feel comfortable QAing, and they are getting us stuck and unable to deploy anything. So, please, can you look at doing the QA for 394645 asap, so we are not blocked anymore on it? Or let us know if you are unable to do it so we try to find someone who can. Some instructions on how'd it be done would be welcome as well. Cheers, Danilo [1]https://devpad.canonical.com/~lpqateam/qa_reports/deployment-stable.html _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
