On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Martin Pool <m...@canonical.com> wrote: > > Yes, I could, that's the plan I outlined in my previous mail. It's > just that having played with graphite this week, going to tuolumne is > a bit of a let down: > > * creating and saving new graphs is a matter of seconds not minutes > * you can do math, with a large choice of functions, within the app > * load times are much faster (though that might now be approved) > * available metrics are in a tree organization, not a long flat list > * more options for how to arrange the graphs > > Obviously you can still get the data we want so it's still worth doing > but it's more hassle and a worse payoff.
We have a huge investment in tuolumne; I think having lightweight datagathering in Launchpad is a great thing to have. I really see this as two entirely separate projects: A - cooler graphing/reporting service B - lightweight instrumentation to gather samples There are no dependencies between A and B - we can have one without the other; the two together are awesome, but I don't think waiting for A to be clear makes waiting to deliver B at all sensible -> It would be awesome if you finish B off. -Rob _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
