On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Martin Pool <m...@canonical.com> wrote: > I agree. I should have made it more clear we thought about the second > option but decided not to do it for now, for just this reason.
Cool. > Even doing the browser-driven requests may make loggerhead timeouts > more obvious, if it leads to people using those features more. We can > alleviate that by using only requests we reasonably expect will be > reliable, and by putting this data under expanders so it's only > fetched when it's wanted. We can scale loggerhead if it gets more use. I'm happy to have stuff we think is usually wanted shown by default; stuff thats not usually wanted I agree we should hide by default. -Rob _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
