-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
... >> BTW. why a 32bit LXC? Wouldn't a 64bit lucid be more like the production >> env? > > I'm running a 32 bit lucid container so the above if condition will fail > regardless of the bitness since dist is not natty or oneric. > > I'm using 32 bit because it was suggested at the time of the original > discussions in the list that this would use far less memory compared > with a 64 bit setup. > I'm using the 32-bit LXC and I'm pretty sure Robert is as well. The difference is pretty large in memory consumption. Which, at least for me, was one of the points of switching to LXC instead of a VM. (I didn't want to lose 1.5GB of memory running a VM, that wasn't really using all of it.) For example, the python redirect script that is loaded into memory whenever Apache starts loads enough of Launchpad's codebase, that it is about 130MB on a 32-bit machine, and 230MB or so on a 64-bit machine. I'm pretty sure that most of it could page out to swap since it doesn't get actively touched. But that is still almost 1/16 of my RAM for something that isn't being used. (Firefox can end up taking more RAM sometimes, but at least I was using it during that time. :) John =:-> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk4S98MACgkQJdeBCYSNAAObNQCdHtc08xS0PKA4L7bbYikgTlK9 SckAniTMjkeNWayyuZV8p9m4/hL73nOT =dWyy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
