I spoke with Aaron on IRC. he identified 820510 and 820511 as the biggest bang for the buck. He did not want to mark these as critical. I don't really agree, but I also don't really care a lot. Yellow hopes to tackle at least one of those RSN.
Gary On Aug 3, 2011, at 7:47 PM, William Grant wrote: > On 04/08/11 06:25, Gary Poster wrote: >> >> On Aug 3, 2011, at 4:03 PM, Aaron Bentley wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We had some issues with the merge-proposal-jobs script earlier today: >>> https://wiki.canonical.com/IncidentReports/2011-08-03-LP-failing-jobs >>> >>> I'm pleased to report that everything is working normally now. >>> Unfortunately, we didn't actually fix anything. It just started working >>> again when we killed and re-ran it. >>> >>> Since it's working now, we don't have enough information to debug it. >>> We can take proactive steps to give us more info in the future. >>> >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820511 >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820516 >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820510 > > Thanks for investigating, Aaron. > >> Are any of these worth special attention (i.e., escalation to critical), >> since they are related to an incident? > > I think some of these need to become critical. > ParallelLimitedTaskConsumer has been implicated in several incidents > this year, although not all of them were recorded formally. > > William > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
