On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Francis J. Lacoste <francis.laco...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Besides testing on staging, anything you can think of blocking this? No, there is nothing blocking Slony-I 2.0. wgrant and myself have both been using it for testing locally, so we are pretty confident our automation all keeps working fine. >> We are scheduled for a real run 2011-09-09 08:30 UTC, applying our >> backlog of database patches. The outage should be well within our 5 >> minute window. It is not yet known which parts of soyuz will be kept >> live during the update, and which fragile parts will be shutdown for a >> longer period. > > I thought we were going to apply one patch per fastdowntime session, in > order to minimize risk? Is that still the plan? Or are we applying all > pending patches in one go? I want to apply them all in one go, and managed to browbeat lifeless into that. I think there is less risk doing it this way than 7 somewhat adhoc rollouts over the next week and a half, and the patches in the backlog are all benign and boring. My prime motivation though is getting devel and db-devel finally back in sync as this is blocking things within and outside of the team. -- Stuart Bishop <stu...@stuartbishop.net> http://www.stuartbishop.net/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
