On 16 September 2011 11:47, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Matthew Revell > <matthew.rev...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> Any comments? > > +1. For clarity - qa-bad would only be for things which are not > feature-flagged and are regressions, right ?
Yeah, Diogo and I discussed it as him applying the tags in just the same way as anyone else. This makes me realise that Diogo hadn't discussed when he should test the branch. It seems to me that he should test only those branches that already have a qa-ok tag. So, it'll be very rare that Diogo will apply a qa-bad tag. -- Matthew Revell Launchpad Product Manager Canonical https://launchpad.net/~matthew.revell _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
