On 11-10-05 06:33 PM, Martin Pool wrote: > On 6 October 2011 08:21, Jelmer Vernooij <jel...@samba.org> wrote: >> Of course we would like to fix the underlying issues, and we're planning >> to do so but that won't happen overnight. In the mean time I think we >> should temper expectations by mentioning Mercurial imports are "beta". >> >> Does this sound reasonable, and what would be the best way to go about >> doing this? > > +1. > > People have previously put 'beta' badges on things. Perhaps we can > reuse that code, or generalize it. I don't know which if any seemed > like an especially good or relevant example, but just looking through > the lp branch history may find something.
It's been ad-hoc up until now. But Deryck has accepted to build a generic way to label things beta as part of the Custom Bugs Listing feature starting next week. So I suggest waiting a few weeks for the generic-beta-feature support to land and then use that. Cheers P.S. I also think that labelling Hg import as beta is a good idea FWIW. -- Francis J. Lacoste francis.laco...@canonical.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
