-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11-10-28 06:00 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> - knowing the layers is important, but having a direct > implementation isn't the best way to make sure folk know whats > under the hood (they may end up just avoiding that code). I wasn't arguing that a direct implementation is a good way to make sure folk know what's under the hood. I was arguing that a direct implementation should not be hard to read. Everyone already knows, or should know, what's under the hood, because it's actually the dashboard, so to speak. Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6r9jEACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI1mTQCbBzbxHE2Ud/mkfMScgrAHFVNc 2I0An2MkgAACsHNeGbL0aaXfquvH80vg =yhA2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
