On 11/11/2011, Deryck Hodge <deryck.ho...@canonical.com> wrote: > > I don't mean to be harsh here, but we already struggle with js slowing > pages down in places. This client-side compile seems completely > unnecessary to me, though I do understand concerns Robert has about > adding a dependency for node. I'm happy for you guys to investigate > client-side use, but I can't help but be skeptical of it. And I'd > just like real proof that it's not any slower.
I'm not seeing the slowdown problems since omitting launchpad from the whitelist of sites I allow to run javascript. It means manually enabling it to include a commit message or prerequisite branch with a merge proposal, but that's a minor annoyance. If the pages started becoming unstyled as well, that would be more frustrating. Martin _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
