On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Graham Binns <gra...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 30 November 2011 22:54, Francis J. Lacoste > <francis.laco...@canonical.com> wrote: >> We already have a tag for regressions. But we don't have a tag for >> critical bugs introduced by new features. So what should we use to group >> these? I know that each feature have their own tag, (currently >> disclosure and bug-columns for example), but it would be easier for >> historical tracking if there was a common tag that was always used. >> >> 'feature' could be it, but we use it to indicate bugs that are really >> feature request. >> >> So I'm looking for suggestions > > Why not just "feature-critical". Or would that be diving back down the > rabbit hole of tags-with-namespaces?
Is that 'critical to this feature' or 'critical and caused by feature work' ? :P I'd suggest just 'feature'. The critical bit we know from the status. -Rob _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
