On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Jeroen Vermeulen <j...@canonical.com> wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Several db-devel branches are ready for deployment. We'd better catch up >> before everyone's away for holidays! >> >> Stuart, any chance you could request the appropriate rollouts for these? >> Besides being on vacation and having some offline places to go to, I'm not >> sure I'd get the requests right. Here's a summary, from oldest to newest:
Think I can do any better? One of the reasons I consider fast downtime db updates a success is I haven't been involved in any of them since the first run :-) >> jelmer >> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/db-stable/revision/11215 >> [r=stub][bug=891928] Allow the deb_version_template field in >> sourcepackagerecipedata to be NULL. >> http://launchpad.net/bugs/891928 >> → Drops a NOT NULL constraint. Sounds very hot-patchable. > > Fairly sure this requires an exclusive table lock, so fast downtime. Yup. >> jtv >> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/db-stable/revision/11224 >> [r=lifeless, stub][bug=849683] NOT NULL constraints on {Binary, >> Source}PackagePublishingHistory.{binary, source}packagename. >> http://launchpad.net/bugs/849683 >> → Took 8 seconds on staging. > > Needs a FDT deploy. > > That means 2 FDT deploys - it will depend on when stub goes on leave > if these happen before the shutdown period, or after - I'm already on > leave. (We don't do them, but they shouldn't be done when there won't > be folk around to recover *if* something goes screwy. Yup. Monday and Wednesday, webops willing? -- Stuart Bishop <stuart.bis...@canonical.com> _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
