On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Dan Harrop-Griffiths <d...@canonical.com> wrote: ... > Also showing up fairly highly under ‘Essential’: > > -Package/Project/Series name: 33.3%. > ... > > Given these findings, I’d recommend that we include ‘Status, Bug > number, Importance and Package/Project/Series display in the first > results line in the bug tracker. >
While I'd hate to argue with data, I still suspect that this information is only useful in certain contexts. i.e. contexts where the listed bugs come from different code bases. Showing the project name on every bug in the bug listing for a project will always be a bad idea. jml _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
