On 20 January 2012 20:18, Guilherme Salgado <guilherme.salg...@linaro.org> wrote:
> In Linaro we've been discussing a new report that would show the upcoming > work assigned to a given team, aggregating work items from blueprints and > bugs (see the attached mockup for an example; just ignore the roadmap cards > line at the top), but for that we do need to have work items as first class > objects, as well as the history of changes made to them. Wow, this looks great. Thanks for working on this. So, [FOREIGN] is a blueprint that is assigned to another team but has some work items that are assigned to this team? And [FUTURE] is a blueprint that is targeted to a future release/milestone but has work items that are targeted to this one. Is that right? > We believe doing it in Launchpad instead of launchpad-work-items-tracker[2] > has many benefits (to ourselves and to other Launchpad users, who might find > that kind of report useful), but just having work items as first class > objects would make it possible to implement many other things (user input > validation when creating/modifying them, ability to generate reports and see > the progress of a blueprint, etc), so we'd like to know if this is something > that would be accepted into Launchpad. Yes, absolutely. This is something we would have wanted to do ourselves, had it not been for our temporary change in focus. Let's have a call early next week to chat about how this might look and work. I'll send an invite. The Product team (user research, text/docs, UI and QA) would be at your service. Cheers! -- Matthew Revell Launchpad Product Manager Canonical https://launchpad.net/~matthew.revell _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
