On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Guilherme Salgado <salg...@canonical.com> wrote: >> I think that would be fine; I'll try to confirm today or tomorrow and >> will let you know. > > Just confirmed and Linaro is fine with us doing some extra work in LP to > offset the maintenance costs added by the work-item changes. Would > something like what I described below be fine? Or maybe Robert can > suggest something? :)
Great! We're still finding our feet on exactly how to hang things together. It looks like a likely first experiment is just lines of code: get a net negative to offset the new schema patch, api code etc, and you'd be meeting the current thoughts we have. I think that this is the simplest approach. And yes, removing a custom view that doesn't work in favour of one that does seems like a great step forward. -Rob _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp