On 14 February 2012 10:01, Jonathan Lange <j...@mumak.net> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Matthew Revell > <matthew.rev...@canonical.com> wrote: > ... >> I'll put my cards on the table and say that my preference is for >> closing the team-member hole and having a separate PPA agreement. >> Obviously that depends on an agreement system that can track more than >> just the one CoC. >> > > Why? > > Are Launchpad's own terms of use not sufficient?
The PPA terms and the general LP terms probably are sufficient, as worded. I think we can do a better job of making them visible and of explicitly asking people to abide by the PPA terms. -- Matthew Revell Launchpad Product Manager Canonical https://launchpad.net/~matthew.revell _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
