On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:17 AM, curtis Hovey <curtis.ho...@canonical.com> wrote: > I am certain users failed to find the '+share' action because the text > is vague and not close the listing of users who are shared with. > > 2010 testing showed that we had to put the link near the table. The text > of the link had to reinforce what and who was in the action. I put the > "+ Add observer" under the table. > > The terminology has changed, and we ignored the old test findings. We > can put a "+Share with a user or team" link above the table. > > Maybe the language should be "+Share with a team or user". Sharing with > users should be rare because it increased the number of things you need > to review. The "number of things" problem is one of central failings of > subscribing users to bugs and branch. It is very difficult to to ensure > everyone has the proper access. Project maintainers should be thinking > of teams before they think of users.
Google hangouts are an example of sharing with milions of users. They show: - a single list - a 'add more people' button in that list - if no sharing takes place it is just the button on its own that is shown. -Rob _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
