On 13/04/12 06:49, Deryck Hodge wrote: > Hi, William. > > I noticed we're maintaining a patched version of python-openid 2.2.1. > versions.cfg suggests you were the last to patch it. > > I'm doing some work that needs the latest python-openid to work well > with pape extension's max_auth_age. Basically, pape extension support > in our patched version is buggy. Can you fill me in on the story about > why we forked? Or did our patches get upstream? Is upgrading > python-openid safe or dangerous? Do you know? > > It seems the forked openid code may pre-date your work, so maybe you > don't know the complete history here either. If not, I welcome > anyone's input here to sort out if python-openid is safe to upgrade. > FWIW, running tests locally with general regex like "login" or "auth" > all seem to pass with the newer python-openid. I haven't run the > complete test suite yet to know for sure about everything.
The only change is to fix the linked bug, https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/676372. http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~wgrant/python-openid/python-openid-2.2.1-fix676372/revision/6 is the diff. http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~keturn/python-openid/master/revision/1969 seems to be the equivalent upstream fix, which looks to be in upstream's 2.2.5 release.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
