On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Matthew Revell <matthew.rev...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 17 May 2012 23:45, Jelmer Vernooij <jel...@canonical.com> wrote: >> I would like to propose removing the existing hg support. I think we >> should remove rather than disable the hg import code because the >> existing bzr-hg code is likely to bitrot further (it depends on >> upstream Mercurial), and there isn't a lot of glue code in >> Launchpad anyway; we won't save all that much time by keeping it in if >> we want to reintroduce it later. Marking Mercurial imports as beta >> doesn't seem reasonable either given only a small minority finishes >> successfully anymore. > > Yeah, a 23.5% success rate is embarrassing and I agree that slapping a > beta tag on it would be inappropriate. > > >From a Product Manager PoV, I agree that we should remove Mercurial > imports but, as I say, I'd like to talk to the 40 lucky winners of the > import lottery before we do anything, to give them a chance to make > other arrangements etc.
This makes sense, you have my support. Thank you both for taking this on. -- Elliot Murphy | https://launchpad.net/~statik/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
