On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Gary Poster <gary.pos...@canonical.com> wrote: > ... > > This process works well for us. It's also scriptable. gary_poster might or > might not be close to a rough Go version of a script that does this. >
Cool. I look forward to seeing that :) [Also, well done on process-izing it] > benji: escaping from the lxc login > > OK, this didn't actually happen at the meeting, but later I found out from > benji how to escape from the lxc login. For instance, if you use lxc-start > to start an lxc container, and then lxc-console to use the container, and > then you want to exit, logging out won't cut it: you'll be challenged to log > in again. The trick is to use ctrl-a q (or with screen, ctrl-a a q) when > you are being asked for to log in. > This is cool. > Pair programming usually helps us move cards, but it didn't for these too. > Does the observer programmer need to keep some things in mind? We agree > that the observer should be actively skeptical and watch the other person's > back. When something doesn't make sense, this is a trigger for both parties > to check assumptions and step back. ACTION: gary_poster will try making > these thoughts into a simple checklist. > I look forward to seeing this. I'm reminded of something from Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality (http://hpmor.com/). He has a trick where he says to himself, "I notice that I am confused", on the understanding that fiction is more likely to confuse than reality. In so much as code is a model of reality, it's a good one to hang on to. See also http://lesswrong.com/lw/if/your_strength_as_a_rationalist/. cheers, jml _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
