On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Richard Harding <rick.hard...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Tue, 07 Feb 2012, Robert Collins wrote: > >> I'm not sure what to do for mailman and moustache.js; for mailman I >> would like us to decouple it more thoroughly (so we can use the system >> mailman, for instance); for moustache.js I'd love input from our js >> afficionados about the standard practices 'out there'. > > For mustache I think we'd be fine just removing it. Mustache has been moved > to a lp.mustache module to work with the combo loader. This required > wrapping the entirety of the sourcecode into a separate JS file. It's MIT > licensed and the maintenance of that is completely on us. If we hit bugs > or need to update, then the YUI module file has to be manually > touched/updated anyway. > > I can work on a branch to move the mustache yui module into the > lib/lp/app/javascript directory with the rest of our library like items.
I've filed the promised bugs. Bug 1016338 is about mustache.js. I wasn't clear from your reply whether you were saying: ' just remove it it is not actually used' or ' to remove it something simple needs to happen'. Could you perhaps comment on the bug (or if it istrivial JFDI it?) Thanks, Rob _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
