On 09/20/2012 01:19 PM, Gavin Panella wrote: > On 20 September 2012 15:26, Deryck Hodge <deryck.ho...@canonical.com> wrote: >> I think the general guideline should be: "Anything more than 3 levels >> deep should raise a red flag in review." > > This seems sensible, especially given the demonstrated performance of > IE. It might not be a first class citizen of Launchpad (or is it? I > can't remember) but I suspect that it's significant.
IE users often do not know they have a slow browser. When they buy a new computer, they attribute the speed up to the hardware or the OS. As of May, IE 8 and 9 can use launchpad to do everything (many features were broken by our novice efforts to use YUI3). They don't have a fast experience, but they can at least use JS to manage bugs, subscriptions, etc.. The only code we specifically have for IE is lp.get_url_path which is needed to page through bug listing. >> As for profiling, I have no idea how to profile in html5-browser. >> Maybe Curtis has ideas? If you just need some peace of mind that >> member resolution is really a cause for concern, we could do a test in >> FF and Chrome using their profiler tools. Also, "High Performance >> JavaScript" has a great chapter on all this, if you haven't read that >> book yet. > > I haven't; I'll see about getting/borrowing a copy. You can run it in a lucid container or ec2. I am reminded that I wanted to restore the option to show a window so that developer can see and debug what is happening in the test browser. -- Curtis Hovey http://launchpad.net/~sinzui
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
