On Oct 03, 2014, at 04:51 PM, Colin Watson wrote: >On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 11:26:18AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> I don't suspect it's possible to accommodate that by setting a flag or >> d/control header or some such. > >We can't make this per-package without significant infrastructure work. >I would suspect that most cases where this kind of thing is an issue >would have been a problem in other ways sooner or later ...
It's almost definitely not worth the extra work. >> Or maybe an arch restriction in the DEP-8 control file for post-build >> testing? > >DEP-8 testing is unaffected by this either way; and we already run DEP-8 >tests on both amd64 and i386, so if your example of system-image were to >break then that would still be caught before reaching the release >pocket. Ah, so "write better tests". I like that. :) -Barry _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
