On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Jeroen T. Vermeulen <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know what you mean with the part about the comment field. Perhaps > you're thinking of my Librarian branch that deals with discrepancies between > the choices of default or slave stores?
No. View the source of a page - at the bottom there is a comment listing some stats, including the time to render. > Anyway, the reason I'm not testing locally is memory. If I create the > thousands of packages and templates I need for a realistic test, the > differences in caching characteristics between my local system and a > production system would probably invalidate the results. The theory is that everything is fast except for rendering: adding thousands of templates on on package should be fine : even at 1K per row, that would be MB's, not 100's of MB's of increased: - pgsql buffer - storm buffer - objects in memory. As long as you don't drive yourself into swap you'll be able to tell, with a much lower turnaround time than reproducing on the actual dataset. If you aren't in swap, and this branch is a faster - say 15% consistently faster - then its a pretty good sign. -Rob -- https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/launchpad/templates-listing/+merge/35185 Your team Launchpad code reviewers is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~jtv/launchpad/templates-listing into lp:launchpad/devel. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-reviewers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-reviewers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
