On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 06:20:17PM +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > To me, the most logical, easy (for upstream) and integrated way to > deal with this is quite obvious: have Launchpad talk to the Bugzilla > at bugs.kde.org (which Amarok is using). As Bugzilla is already able
We already synchronize status from the KDE bug tracker, which allows Launchpad watches on KDE bugs to be updated. Part of the problem Sarah is pointing out is that there are many Ubuntu-reported bugs that are actually upstream, and that upstream is offering to triage them for us. I certainly disagree with this being anything but triage -- for instance, if the bug has been fixed upstream, it should remain open in Ubuntu until a new package is made available. However, for the first half of the triage process (i.e. from New to Confirmed) the statuses are similar. The question for me is what specifically are these triagers find to be problems? What would they like to do which they currently can't? -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3376 0125 -- launchpad-users mailing list launchpad-users@lists.canonical.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/launchpad-users
