I don't. The other day I was browsing through bugs and saw a few from
Breezy still open. Breezy isn't supported, and it won't be getting any
fixes, so the bugs should be closed.
On 9/28/07, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Curtis Hovey writes ("Re: Massive bug expiration spree (Restoring all bugs
> to their previous status)"):
> > We will perform a public test on staging with the revised expiration
> > rules. Launchpad users can see the results, and provide additional
> > feedback that we will incorporate into the rules. We will not run the
> > bug expiration process in production until the community agrees the
> > process is right.
>
> For what it's worth, I think the approach of expiring bugs
> automatically in this way is misguided.
>
> That is to say, I think the right process is this one:
>
> 0. All bugs are exempt
>
> Ian.
>
> --
> launchpad-users mailing list
> launchpad-users@lists.canonical.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/launchpad-users
>
--
Mackenzie Morgan
Linux User #432169
ACM Member #3445683
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com <-my blog of Ubuntu stuff
apt-get moo
--
launchpad-users mailing list
launchpad-users@lists.canonical.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/launchpad-users
