Martin Pitt wrote: > In fact this spethial case has bothered me a lot. We have never > supported running multiple evolution packages in parallel, since we > don't do them (our package name does not have the version number, for > example). Therefore I don't actually see a reason to not change the > domain to just "evolution" in our packages?
And while we're at it, maybe gcc should be changed in the other direction? AFAIK gcc-3.4, gcc-4.1 etc. all use the same domain even though they can easily run side by side. Worth patching up the packages maybe? Jeroen -- launchpad-users mailing list launchpad-users@lists.canonical.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/launchpad-users
