Hi, Robert. On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Robert Collins<[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 07:37 -0500, Deryck Hodge wrote: > >> I commented on one of the bugs, but just to continue on list.... >> >> As Martin notes, I'm not sure the default sort should be changed to >> favor the triager. If I'm just browsing for bugs in a another project >> would I want this new sort order? Maybe so, but I'm not sure. Maybe >> comments here will help us gauge interest in this. > > So, I filed those bugs after realising that what I do as someone that > uses launchpad a lot, is fight the sort order, every single time I want > to assess 'the next thing to do' in a project I'm contributing to. >
You make a convincing case. :) >> I should note that I'm more hesitant about changing the default sort >> order of importance than the secondary sort on status. I think the >> secondary sort being status rather than bug number is reasonable. The >> questions for me are really around determining in what order >> importance should be sorted by default and finding a way to help >> people more easily re-sort bug lists. > > +1 on being more easily able to re-sort bug lists; that shouldn't stop > us thinking about what sort we want by default :). Agreed. I'm not sure that we'll have time to do anything much about re-sorting or default sort order before the 3.0 release (unless Vikram continues to take up this work! :), but certainly, the comments here and in the bugs filed won't be forgotten as we move forward beyond 3.0. Cheers, deryck -- Deryck Hodge https://launchpad.net/~deryck http://www.devurandom.org/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
