Thanks for the tips folks.  I'm not sure how much changing the version is an
option for me.


> It's not messed up, but as others have said you can't reuse that version.
>
> If you just got it slightly wrong, increment the number and try again.
>  For example if you accidentally uploaded 2.2 as 2.3-1ubuntu1, and you
> now want to upload the real 2.3, just say 2.3-1ubuntu-2.  If you used
> a number very far in the future and the real series will never pass
> that, you need to use an epoch as Umang suggested.
>
> If you need help say more about your particular case.
>


I'm trying to maintain a patch against the kernel, and I'm trying to script
most of the re-packaging.  I made some mistakes and I ended up uploading a
maverick versioned meta-linux to the lucid series.  So 2.6.35 instead of
2.6.32, ie, for the life of lucid.  I believe I have the issue fixed, so it
shouldn't be a problem in the future.  But it is still good to know that I
have to be careful.

I'm using a testing ppa, soo, I think worse comes to worse, I think I can
just create a new testing ppa.  And regarding changing the epoch, I suspect
that just making a new ppa makes more sense and is less risky.

Let me know if there is anything wrong with my approach.

Thanks,
Dan
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to