I would like to combine array size and index array.  So that if I wire a
3D array into it it morphs into a 3 output icon with an output for each
index.  4D array begats 4 outputs and so on.  No reason why it couldn't
have the "old style" output as well.

I suppose I can go make my own now that I thought of it.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rolf.kalbermatter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 7:43 AM
> To: 'Gary'
> Cc: Info LabVIEW (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Another wish-list item - 2D array concatenation
>
>
>
> "Rubin, Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >While we're on the subject of wish lists, I'd like to propose a more
> flexible build
> >array function.
> >My current frustration is caused by 2D array concatenation.
> If I have two
> NI-DAQ
> >devices, each collecting 3 channels with 1000 samples, I'd
> like to be able to
> >concatenate the outputs of the AI Reads so that I have an array of 6
> channels of
> >1000 samples each.  Instead, I get a 3 by 2000 array.  The
> workaround is to
> >transpose the outputs of each AI Read, concatenate, then
> transpose the
> resulting
> >array - not a very efficient approach as the number of
> samples increases.
> >It would be nice if the build array function had the options
> "Concatenate
> columns"
> >and "Concatenate rows".
>
> How about using Insert Array with the number of scans wired
> to the second
> index
> input? Simple and probably the most efficient method to do.
>
> Rolf Kalbermatter
> CIT Engineering Nederland BV    tel: +31 (070) 415 9190
> Treubstraat 7H                           fax: +31 (070) 415 9191
> 2288 EG Rijswijk http://www.citengineering.com
> Netherlands  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>


Reply via email to