Instead of asking if this is possible, I would ask if this is necessary.

If you are just averaging the data, there is no reason to acquire at 10
MS/s.  I assume you are using a portion of this data for some sort of
analysis or storing it for later use.

Perhaps you could use a slower speed card and an averaging filter to
monitor the data, then use the high speed card to grab the block of data
you need.  If the events being monitored are not predictable, you could
use a circular buffer to acquire 3 seconds worth of data for each
channel into onboard memory.  Whenever you need the data, you could
download it into the computer's memory.

I don't know if this would work with your application, but it is
probably worth looking at alternative strategies for acquiring the data
you need with lower overhead.

Bruce

------------------------------------------
Bruce Ammons
Ammons Engineering
www.ammonsengineering.com
(810) 687-4288 Phone
(810) 687-6202 Fax



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of E. Blasberg
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 9:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 60MS/sec- is this possible?


Hi All,

This may sound naive, but I have a customer who wants to sample up to 
6 channels across 3 boards (2 channels/board) at a sampling rate of 
10 Megasamples/sec/channel (i.e., 60 MS/s in total).

Three different units are being measured simultaneously, which is why 
3 boards are necessary (they don't all start or stop at the same 
time, but they could all be on at the same time).

Currently the system measures 50KS/s/channel with no problem (plus up 
to 2 channels of AO).  The data is averaged each second and put into 
a FIFO buffer which is usually 2 minutes (120 samples) long.  Every 2 
seconds, the FIFO is averaged (to get a running average).  I should 
add that a GPIB data logger is read every 2 seconds for slower data.

My NI rep has suggested the PCI-6115 whose specs could certainly 
handle this.  What I'm worried about is the computer keeping up with 
averaging 60MS/s.

Anyone have any experience using these data rates over an extended 
period of time (measurements can last WEEKS).

Much TIA,
E. Blasberg
iDAQ Solutions Ltd



Reply via email to