All,

Thanks for the many replies.  Just to summarize and respond:

1.  I didn't mean to give the impression that I'm anti-d'Hell.  Pretty
much every test station I've had responsibility for in the past 5+ years
here was built around one of their desktop or small tower
configurations.  With few exceptions, they've proven to be a reliable
choice.

2.  I wasn't looking to change the form factor or scope of this existing
setup.  I just wanted to replace a small tower workstation with a newer
one.  I've often looked at rackmount/passive backplane/industrial PC
setups but they've never (in hindsight) been justifiable for our apps.

3.  Being attached to the same corporate net used by every other PC and
server in the facility is pretty fundamental to the way we do business.

4.  Our 'IT department' consists of two long-term, hard-working regular
guys here at our location, and a small army of people at our HQ location
and other sites.  My argument was with a policy, not with a person.

The only thing that seems to have changed about the situation since
other, earlier purchases for test equipment use is the level of charges
on the invoice for software licensing which I argue is unnecessary, but
others tell me is required for corporate liability's sake.  While I
framed the issue in terms of being a good steward of the company's
money, the greater perspective is that it's just a cost of doing
business.

The PO went up the chain unmodified from the original quote.  As I
described, that's about 900 USD for a basic PC with XPpro (no monitor),
and about 480 USD for additional licenses.  If this is the price of
feeling good about doing business with MS, well, OK...

Best regards,

Dave

David J Boyd
Senior Test Engineer
Respironics
175 Chastain Meadows Court
Kennesaw GA 30144-3724
(V) 770-429-2809 (F) 770-423-2300

========================================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
----------------------
This message, together with any attachments, may be legally privileged
and is confidential information intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed.  It is exempt from
disclosure under applicable law including court orders.  If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
dissemination, distribution or copy of this message, or any attachment,
is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error,
please notify the original sender and delete this message, along with
any attachments, from your computer.



Reply via email to