Just out of curiosity... But when you aquire the 40 channels in the main
application, are any of the channels unwired / ungrounded?  From my
experience, acquiring ungrounded channels in the midst of properly wired
channels will cause some type of saturation within the data acquisition
card, or at least bogus noise in the signals.  I'm not sure of the exact
details, but it has to do with the ADC multiplexer that while switching, it
doesn't have enough time to settle between channel reads that it makes it
seem that the signals are fluctuating dramatically.

Try: 1) change your channel list to only contain channels necessary to your
appliation, 2) if the channel list can't be changed then try grounding these
open channels... By grounding them, this will diminish any bogus noise
you'll get in your acquisition routine.

Hopefully this helps.

-------
Juan Carlos Flores
ArchonWest Technologies
telephone: 888.824.2320
mobile: 323.620.1548
http://www.archonwest.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Barry Brophy
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Question to Info-LabVIEW Digest


LabVIEW SCXI 1100 anomaly

Dear all,

I have run into a truly bizarre anomaly when reading from an SCXI 1100 card
with labview 6.1. I have been using labview for over 4 years and have never
seen anything like this. I wonder if anyone can help me.

I have an application with many temperature readings. I have a dedicated
SCXI 1102 card for most of these but I have not got enough channels so I
have been using an SCXI 1100 card for the spillover. I noticed that the
readings I was getting for this card were fluctuating a lot, much more than
they did when I checked the signal in MAX. Also, I noticed that when I
acquired from the 1100 card in a calibration routine elsewhere in my
application, the signal wasn't fluctuating at all. The only difference
between the calibration routine and the main application is that in the main
application I am acquiring over 40 channels whereas in the calibration
routine I am taking only 3 or 4 at a time.

The code I am using is exactly the same in the two locations. only the
number of channels being acquired is different. The signals from the 1100
are affected but the signals from the 1102 are fine in both routines. I have
repeated this problem in two different locations. I have also noticed that
it affects pressure signals on the SCXI 1100 as well. Can anyone offer me
any advice on this?

Regards,

Barry Brophy







Reply via email to