Hi Barry,

I suspect you have a mix of pressure and temperature channels connected
to the SCXI 1100.

Note that the 1100 and the 1102 are slightly different on the inside.
The 1100 has only one amplifier (and correspondingly, only 1 gain value)
that is multiplexed to all the input channels.  So it is not recommended
to choose channels that have different gains on them connected to it.

Temperature channels will use 1000 gain (or something high), whereas any
other channel will need a lot less gain, so the lowest possible gain
value will be applied to all the channels which is why they may seem
like they are "noisy" or jumping around.
In NI-MAX when you look at that individual channel, the max gain will be
applied and the thermocouples will look solid and reliable.

The gain selection is transparent to the user and is based on the
channel range that you specify on the virtual channel.

The 1102 actually has a separate amplifier for each of the 32 input
channels and you can set individual gains for each of them (again
transparent to the user, based on the channel range).  Note that it does
not have as high a gain as the 1100 module.

So move all temperature channels to the 1100, and other channels to the
1102.  This is the recommended solution as the 1100 is designed for
thermocouple channels which require high gain.

Or move channels that require the same gain to the 1100, and rest of the
channels to the 1102.
That should fix it.


Neville Dholoo
Cellex Power Products, Inc.
Richmond BC
Canada


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Question to Info-LabVIEW Digest
From: "Barry Brophy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 16:01:11 +0100

LabVIEW SCXI 1100 anomaly

Dear all,

I have run into a truly bizarre anomaly when reading from an SCXI 1100
card
with labview 6.1. I have been using labview for over 4 years and have
never
seen anything like this. I wonder if anyone can help me.

I have an application with many temperature readings. I have a dedicated
SCXI 1102 card for most of these but I have not got enough channels so I
have been using an SCXI 1100 card for the spillover. I noticed that the
readings I was getting for this card were fluctuating a lot, much more
than
they did when I checked the signal in MAX. Also, I noticed that when I
acquired from the 1100 card in a calibration routine elsewhere in my
application, the signal wasn't fluctuating at all. The only difference
between the calibration routine and the main application is that in the
main
application I am acquiring over 40 channels whereas in the calibration
routine I am taking only 3 or 4 at a time.

The code I am using is exactly the same in the two locations... only the
number of channels being acquired is different. The signals from the
1100
are affected but the signals from the 1102 are fine in both routines. I
have
repeated this problem in two different locations. I have also noticed
that
it affects pressure signals on the SCXI 1100 as well. Can anyone offer
me
any advice on this?

Regards,

Barry Brophy



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: RE: Question to Info-LabVIEW Digest
From: "Juan Carlos Flores" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 08:48:27 -0700

Just out of curiosity... But when you aquire the 40 channels in the main
application, are any of the channels unwired / ungrounded?  From my
experience, acquiring ungrounded channels in the midst of properly wired
channels will cause some type of saturation within the data acquisition
card, or at least bogus noise in the signals.  I'm not sure of the exact
details, but it has to do with the ADC multiplexer that while switching,
it
doesn't have enough time to settle between channel reads that it makes
it
seem that the signals are fluctuating dramatically.

Try: 1) change your channel list to only contain channels necessary to
your
appliation, 2) if the channel list can't be changed then try grounding
these
open channels... By grounding them, this will diminish any bogus noise
you'll get in your acquisition routine.

Hopefully this helps.

-------
Juan Carlos Flores
ArchonWest Technologies
telephone: 888.824.2320
mobile: 323.620.1548
http://www.archonwest.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Barry Brophy
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Question to Info-LabVIEW Digest


LabVIEW SCXI 1100 anomaly

Dear all,

I have run into a truly bizarre anomaly when reading from an SCXI 1100
card
with labview 6.1. I have been using labview for over 4 years and have
never
seen anything like this. I wonder if anyone can help me.

I have an application with many temperature readings. I have a dedicated
SCXI 1102 card for most of these but I have not got enough channels so I
have been using an SCXI 1100 card for the spillover. I noticed that the
readings I was getting for this card were fluctuating a lot, much more
than
they did when I checked the signal in MAX. Also, I noticed that when I
acquired from the 1100 card in a calibration routine elsewhere in my
application, the signal wasn't fluctuating at all. The only difference
between the calibration routine and the main application is that in the
main
application I am acquiring over 40 channels whereas in the calibration
routine I am taking only 3 or 4 at a time.

The code I am using is exactly the same in the two locations. only the
number of channels being acquired is different. The signals from the
1100
are affected but the signals from the 1102 are fine in both routines. I
have
repeated this problem in two different locations. I have also noticed
that
it affects pressure signals on the SCXI 1100 as well. Can anyone offer
me
any advice on this?

Regards,

Barry Brophy






----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: DAQmx pretrigger
From: "Seifert, George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 14:59:23 -0500

I'm trying to convert two channels on a PCI-MIO-16E-1 board using DAQmx
and LV7.0. I need to get some of the pretrigger samples. The best I can
figure out from the documentation is that if I want to get pretrigger
samples I can only convert one channel? Can that be right?

George

Medtronic Neurological, Inc., Sullivan Lake 
MS: N240 
800 53rd Avenue NE 
Columbia Heights, MN 55421-1200 
(763) 514-7264
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Slow Printing
From: "Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 13:58:38 -0700

Does the slow printing problem go away with an upgrade to LV 7 or 7.1
and 
win XP? I am trying to make the case for upgrading. Changing from the 
windows platform is not an option but an upgrade to LV 7 and XP may be.

I assumed (yes I know <g>) that all Windows had some kind of print
spooler 
that would spool a print job to disk or memory and then send it to the 
printer in the background.

I have seen the slow printing under labview several times (version 6.x) 
with NT-4 and Win 98. Am I doing something wrong in my programming? My 
strategy is to check the Automatically print panel every time vi
completes 
execution box and then run the vi.

I want to be lazy and not have to change a lot of code. It seems that
with 
all that NI does to make programming easy, they would have handled this
in 
some way. If that is not an option then I will try the suggestion from
Dan.

Frank




Original message:
>I have a system with Labview 6.0 on NT-4 that prints a 1 page report.
This 
>is done by selecting Automatically print panel every time vi completes 
>execution. This vi takes about 30 seconds to complete, probably due to
a 
>slow connection to the network printer. If the Automaticaly print panel

>checkbox is not checked the vi runs in about a second so it seems that
the 
>printing is the problem. Has anyone else seen this slow printing? Is
there 
>any way to have labview spool to a file and then print the file or some

>other way to speed up printing.
>
>I am trying to avoid allowing the print routines to run in a different 
>thread because that would require extensive rewriting.
>
>Thanks
>
>



----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of Info-LabVIEW Digest



Reply via email to