[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Sue,
That's an excuse, not an explanation IMO. Some columnists have publicly
apologized for taking Paula Jones lightly and finding James Carville's
characterization of her uproariously funny. When an organization like NOW
brushes off crude attacks on a woman who claims to have been sexually
abused, it is farfetched to claim it is because she has some marginal
resources. The initial supporters of Jones were an eclectic assortment of
rightwingers and a total incompetent for a lawyer - a real estate lawyer
yet. All this against the President of United States.
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Terry:
>
>One thing that Paula has is lawyers, and the Rutherford institute behind
>her, as well of course Susan.
>
>Kathleen Willey, has none of the above.
>
>Perhaps that is one reason these women felt she needed some backing of
>some sort. Just guess at this of course.
>
>Sue
>> Hi Sue,
>>
>> Naturally they wouldn't care to explain that Kathleen Willey is not a lower
>> class type with the wrong hairdo and accent. Paula Jones was assaulted just
>> as surely as Willey was and suffered further intimidation and humiliation.
>> Best, Terry
>
>--
>Two rules in life:
>
>1. Don't tell people everything you know.
>2.
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
>
Best, Terry
"Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
