Richard Soderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sodie Seaz:
The legal minds on CNN say that it is the only way to fight herclaim of
sexual aversion. This is a damage claim. which is something she has not
had here to fore.
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 18:29:30 -0500
From: moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: L&I Sexual History/Herstory
moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Evenin,
If Clinton's sexual past is fair game in showing a pattern of behavior
in the case
of Jones v. Clinton and Jones claims she now has a "sexual aversion"
despite having
sex anyway then why cannot her sexual history be used to refute her claim?
...Mac
The dirty old Gandy Dancer
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
